![cnn meme creator cnn meme creator](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/98/2e/31/982e3119f06d6ea10c2c8dc660e317d2.jpg)
![cnn meme creator cnn meme creator](https://img.memecdn.com/cnn-knows_o_7220804.jpg)
For one thing, although Cuomo happens to be correct in this case, I don't trust his definition of hate or bigotry. Let's chew on this question and assertion for a moment. In a now-deleted tweet, CNN's oft-confused Chris Cuomo asked: "Should CNN reveal name of Reddit user who made trump wrestling video? Had a lot of bigoted and hateful material on page and website." I guess if HanA**holeSolo does anything it deems ugly, the network reserves the right to put him in "danger"? CNN has absolved the man of his sins - for now. I've read thousands of news stories and written a bunch of them, and I can't think of a single instance of a similar disclaimer. There is simply no other way for an open-minded person to comprehend the meaning of the line. Should HanA**holeSolo ever revert to his nefarious meme-making ways, "CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change." "CNN is not publishing 'HanA**holeSolo's' name because he is a private citizen who has issued an extensive statement of apology, showed his remorse by saying he has taken down all his offending posts, and because he said he is not going to repeat this ugly behavior on social media again," said a CNN piece.
![cnn meme creator cnn meme creator](https://i.imgflip.com/2/2covha.jpg)
It is clear that if HanA**holeSolo had responded to CNN by saying, "No, I'm not sorry, losers," he would have been outed. Is it saying that anti-Trump activists will hurt the man? Is it saying that there should be no repercussion for things we say? Is this protection afforded all Americans? Moreover, the piece itself (and the on-air personalities at CNN) disputes the idea that his name was withheld to protect safety. Even if we concede that there's a good reason to track down a meme maker on Reddit, why doesn't the network run the name? Without the name, in fact, there is no real story.ĬNN claims it kept the poster's anonymity to protect his safety. What CNN has done is induce some random troll to grovel and apologize for his wrongthink. It was a story birthed from the hysterics that erupted over a silly meme Trump retweeted. It wasn't an argument over ideas or policy. This piece didn't educate viewers on the underbelly of social media, or the habits of the president, or anything else. For all the sanctimonious self-championing of the importance of journalism in the Trump era, stories like these have no real purpose. That's because news organizations have become obsessed with fighting Trump rather than covering him. The story was meant to tie a Trump tweet mocking CNN to a hateful meme maker and blow up. CNN tracked down his identity because he had committed thought crimes, the worst of which was mocking CNN. The search for HanA**holeSolo began before anyone knew he was responsible for anti-Semitic or bigoted posts. This is about how places like CNN function these days: how it overreacts to everything the president does, how many of today's newsrooms give some people a pass and destroy others. Then again, this story isn't really about online harassment or the Reddit user "HanA**holeSolo," who has taken credit for the creation a GIF of President Trump body-slamming a wrestler - which I feel the need to reiterate is fake violence - with a CNN logo imposed on his face. Today, the internet has created an environment that incentivizes people to create detestable messages meant to troll and harass. There was a time when anonymity allowed Americans with unpopular or unconventional beliefs to make their arguments without fear of retribution.
#CNN MEME CREATOR FREE#
You're not a martyr for the cause of free expression. If you're going to create nasty memes to get attention, demand people give you credit for those memes and celebrate when the president of the United States shares one with his roughly 33 million followers, I have no sympathy for you.